The pictures for this material will be chicks. Because it’s not clear what can be substituted here, but beautiful chicks are very clear.

If you follow the classification of personality types according to Lichko, among other things, there are two opposite options: hysteroid and schizoid.

Hysteroid – a dude who requires a lot of attention and is extremely self-centered. He does everything for show, shows off a lot, doesn’t like it when people start praising someone other than himself and demands admiration for himself.

Guess where I’m going with this.

The second type is schizoid. The character is closed, does not like to communicate with others and, as a result, is inept in communication. He is bad at empathy, he doesn’t understand the emotions of others very well, and he doesn’t try to express his own normally.

Of course, there are practically no pure psychotypes; we are all mixed. But sometimes in the “mix” you come across excellent game: for example, when a person has a hysteroischizoid personality type. Absolutely oppositely directed vectors that dramatically interfere with each other. This is me, by the way. And I didn’t come up with such a diagnosis for myself, it was pointed out to me by professionals.

Not everything is as bad as it might seem from a superficial listing: a hysteroschizoid is an ideal blogger, for example. His personal comfort zone is never violated, he sits at home, but at the same time he receives a ton of targeted attention. Minus: perceives this attention hysterically, that is, close to the heart and emotionally. And, you know, lately I’ve had quite a bit of negative feedback addressed to me.

__STOP__
Just don’t think that I’m being rude here, that I’m seeking pity and that I’m generally such a sissy – fuck it, I’m 25 and have a beard, I can handle a bad mood. I just wanted to talk to someone like a human being. I wanted to talk about my own perspective and ask questions.

__CONTINUE__

VGA-17 took place not long ago, and it was probably the worst broadcast of my life. I’ve never participated in mass meetings at all, and I’ve been trying not to show up at conferences like E3 lately, knowing that I’m showing myself very poorly. And then, “very bad” = talk bullshit and screw up in fact 100% of the time: at least you can laugh at such an idiot. But everyone should be ashamed of the idiot with VGA – this is such a pure, extreme degree of irritation that it is absolutely impossible to contemplate.

It’s a pity that I can’t show this post personally to every commentator: guys, unfortunately, I understand everything myself.

I sincerely envy Gleb, Vasya and Kostya, who have a brilliant sense of humor (oh, you should have heard how Gleb jokes about the death of Kostya’s father every “Igromir”), but even more I envy Malt and Fen, who never really joke, but at the same time they feel absolutely relaxed and comfortable on air.

Instead of behaving in a way that would be good for me, I try with all my might to awkwardly live up to expectations: what is this, VGA! The funniest event of the year! Everyone is waiting for meat! And then some unconscious mechanisms begin to work, which try to pass off what my unconscious considers to be content.

1. For me humor = content. Like, I don’t really understand why you can even watch streams if there’s no laughing. Question for you: what is the content of a good stream (outside of stories about the game)? What should a good streamer do to be interesting to listen to??

The question is even, perhaps, more complex: I generally do not know how to recognize and evaluate human charm. What does it even mean to be charming?? Is there something tangible, concrete in this that can be perceived as instructions for action??

2. Let’s do this: which of the StopGame authors do you enjoy watching and what qualities/behavioral characteristics in them appeal to you?? Like, “I love watching Galperov because he is polite, calm and tactful”. And vice versa, what irritates you in whom?? Like, “I can’t stand Fen, with his extreme arrogance and aggressive behavior towards everyone around him.”.

Well, first of all, I would like to hear such feedback about myself. The main thing I want to take away from this post is simple human feedback: what I’m doing better, what’s worse. What do you think is “my” line of behavior, and when do I look shameful and ridiculous??

In other places and situations, getting feedback is extremely problematic. For example, in the comments under “Debriefing” there were FEEDBACK TO ALL REVIEWS. Thanks to them, I decided to eliminate myself from the active space of the site for several weeks: not a single stream in the “Month of Hot Countries”, no video content. I don’t want to impress or scare anyone with this, this is kindergarten. It’s just that when under a new section the first and top comment is: “We are waiting for Kungurov with Zelda,” well, this is unhealthy shit, fucking needs to be cooled. I must have gone too far somewhere.

Despite the fact that initially everything with Zelda really seemed like a great idea to me: “Debriefing” is meaningfully a show about emotions, about stories from games, and Zelda, firstly, is inaccessible to most players, and secondly, it creates these same stories in batches. This is an interesting and relevant story for many.

My intervention is somewhat deeper: I believe that “Parsing” is now in a big dead end. He works for a closed audience and tinkers with games that are not indexed by search at all. This means that the audience of “Analysis” will either decrease or grow due to any other actions of SG. This is shit and shouldn’t be like that. This is the wasted potential of a particular show, and Ockham will not approve of creating new sections ad infinitum. The core audience doesn’t care, but the show has problems.

However, I am attentive to reactions: if they surround me with shit, I bow my head and move away. Especially considering that the “special issue” did not provide any boost, not even a microscopic one, the social experiment was a failure. I promised not to interfere in the creative process when I took over the leadership, so any further development of “Parsing” will depend on Vasya and Malt.

3. How long will you stick your nose in?? Where do my editor-in-chief powers end in your opinion, in the audience’s opinion?. Can I tell the boys: “Take ME: Andromeda into analysis, because there will be views!”? After all, everything that I do and will do is for only one thing – so that StopGame lives. So that the decrepit StopGame, which year after year only loses and loses on all fronts, survives, primarily due to the fact that it is losing the war for YouTube. So where does the line “Kungurs, don’t interfere” and the line “Experiments that need to be carried out so that we grow the audience and not lose it” go??

For example, we raped Infact for a very long time, because I looked at the audience retention charts. Whether you liked the introduction or not, I now understand a lot more about how videos work on YT, and how we can get it right with the channel’s inevitable rebrand someday. And right now I am faced with the most difficult task in the world – to reinvent the video review format (believe me, this is really necessary, I have statistics in my hands).

Ahead is a text section, the rebirth of which is generally the path to Fuji. Ugh, the entire SG management is one endless Fuji, which we, in any case, must all climb together. Do you like Kungurov or not?.

I understand perfectly well that I am ten times less charming than Kulakov or Trostenyuk. Moreover, “hysterics” even have a line: “They are unable to become an informal leader in a team” – purely from the psychological characteristics of people.

In general, I understand little when communicating with people, and books on psychology and cognitive science really make me feel better and more comfortable. I’m starting to see at least some logic in reactions, I can somewhat successfully predict them. But some things still remain shrouded in secrecy:

4. So why am I https://nonukcasinosites.co.uk/european/ ChSV? Where does this always come from?? What not to do in order to “not be a private person”? Nobody can explain this to me for 20 years. Let’s try again – why not ChSVhen Malt, but I? And sometimes Vasya comes for the same thing. What are the nuances that make up this?? And has that changed over the past year?? (For example, I think that I learned to express my opinion quite well in “Kinologists”).

I am ready to listen, ready to adjust behavior and nuances. Not because he “bent in”, “he started snot, take Kostyan’s example and go to hell with everyone laughing loudly”. But because I believe that there is no limit to the ability to present yourself, and “It’s impossible to please everyone” is a thesis for weaklings. Everyone in his country liked Hitler until 1939, everyone liked Mercury, Oksimiron is doing well. There is no limit to personal charm, there is a limit to the practical advice that you can squeeze out of those around you.

Fortunately, on SG I am surrounded by people who are angry, active and constructive.

—P.S. The sweatiest thing in my life is “Gathering 2017”. I received both positive comments and well-deserved negativity regarding my role as the toastmaster of the event. But there, from my subjective assessment of my own “charm,” is my absolute ceiling, which was ensured by the wildest support of everyone in the hall, on both sides of the stage, an eerie number of preparations and some kind of extreme composure, so as not to give too much.

Best comments

I wrote everything here.

I will only repeat that Dima needs to stop bothering himself so much and trying to overcome his inner perfectionist. Dimon is a great fellow, and SG in terms of content quality is now at the level/above even the golden era of SGTV, Max-Glavred, Igrozor, etc.d. in my humble opinion.

On the second point.

I love Fen for the fierce meticulousness in his materials. The recent history of the Rockstar company was very impressive with the amount of work.

Galperov expressively conveys his impressions in his own style, so you always get the feeling that you are sitting with your bros on discord.

Krasnopolskaya does high-quality reviews of (hi Nathan) specific games that not everyone will play, which is what sold me Berseria at the time.

Well, Dimon, you know how to perfectly convey the spirit of the game with your reviews. You don’t have any universal formula, you look for a new approach to each review.

P.S. Don’t be offended by the comments, everything is fine. We are loving.

P.P.S. Return the mower.

Well, yes, you are too focused on what you consider to be your problems:
“Why watch streams if it’s not funny??»
Well, someone is watching Naritsa and Baranov! And there they don’t deliver laughs very often. They talk more often about politics, philosophy and history and people like! Even now, at 1 a.m. Moscow time, when half of the country is already asleep, 600 devoted fans are watching Naritsa, alone droning something about Kingdom Come (a very, VERY niche stream, despite all the hype around the game, especially considering the length of the stream, the rarity of lulz and almost zero work with the chat).

"I’m too boring"
Are you saying that Kulakov’s jokes are funnier?? IMHO, not much. Why is Kulakov increasingly perceived better?? Because he doesn’t get hysterical if he doesn’t succeed. He laughs at his failures and everyone laughs. And it ends with a claw emoticon on Twitch and an animation with Max screaming on donations. And in terms of ideas, you will be richer, either Max or Tosti.

“How deeply do I have the right to get into some format?»
It’s like sex: as long as both partners agree, it’s not rape. The partners in this case are you and the presenters of the format. In general, in my vision it should be something like this: the editor throws out an idea to improve the format, with arguments for and against, everyone discusses it, and in the end the decision is made by voting. You don’t have totalitarianism there. And the audience… As if we have alternatives? All other gaming publications seem faceless and stuck in the last century to me. Or recruiting laymen who don’t understand anything and write columns that make you want to spit. Besides, I haven’t seen any bad decisions on your part yet. Another thing is that not the entire audience is able to appreciate these decisions, no matter how much the SG instills the ability to analyze and reflect.

Do not under any circumstances destroy the First Comment! If you do this, you will not be forgiven!
Changes are always necessary, otherwise there will be stagnation. Stopgame can be blue, red or green, the chief editor can be Max, Trostya or you. But the main thing is that Stopgeym remains Stopgeym. It’s clear that we need views, an increase in viewers, etc.d., but in pursuit of a new audience you need not to lose the old one. I am convinced, and many, I believe, will agree with me that one of the most adequate and, dare I say it, “best” audiences lives in the vastness of SG. And not only in comparison with other gaming sites, but also in the segment of the Russian-language Internet in general. Look for yourself, Dima, there have already been more than a hundred comments here, and almost all of them contain competent and constructive opinions and suggestions; and almost every comment contains words of support. Words of support addressed to you personally, Dima. Because for us Stopgeym is not just an abstract editorial team, but specific people whom we have known and valued for a long time.
In the “offline” category, the site becomes better and more diverse every year, here
there can be no complaints at all. Perhaps more different text materials would not hurt. And give some kind of prize to Kirill Voloshin, a Stakhanovite text writer.
But with streaming it’s not so simple. Firstly, there is a lot of Naritsa. Of course, it’s clear that the “on-air network” needs to be filled with something, but you can only listen to this dude when he talks about the game or topics related to the game. Otherwise, this is an ever-raising voice, interrupting his interlocutors. Damn Bitch Important kid, whose speech consists of 15% parasitic words and phrases like “it happens” and “this is normal”. Baranov is a bad streamer simply because he is a bore. Well, to hell with them, “if you don’t want it, don’t watch it,” but those 7- and 11-hour streams that Naritsa conducts on Twitch SG have a place in blogs next to “three in one”.
Secondly, there are no those very duets of Oreshkin with Shalashov and Tosti with Max, which were good because the streamers received no less fan from them than the audience. On Kostya and Maxim’s Friday streams there was such an atmosphere as if you had gathered with friends and were drinking beer in the yard, laughing at each other and discussing everything. This genuine atmosphere of a friendly get-together is sorely lacking in current streams. A separate category was mass kneading, which is similar to FlatOut streams, although they happen once a year. Try to somehow get Kulakov, Kostya, Kost and Igor (and also Solod and Gleb) together for the batch; entries on Grid and Chivalry have been reviewed more than once. The current Friday streams are not even close to those.
And finally, as has already been told to you, focus less on what they write about you personally, and more on what they write about SG. I remember there used to be people who said: “What is this Kulakov doing anyway: he doesn’t come to streams, he delays reviews!? What kind of editor-in-chief is this??». To which they answered: “Have you even seen the site before Kulakov became editor-in-chief?”?", after which the questioner lost all questions. I wish they would say that about you someday. Thank you if you finished reading; It’s not in vain that I struggled, it means.
P.S. Stop using all sorts of fancy words if you can easily do without them. For example, instead of “differentiate” you can calmly say “divide” without compromising the meaning.
P.S.S. Stop rubbing the word “postmodernism” into holes already. There is no clear definition for it at all. Well, or once and for all, explain what you specifically mean by it and use it for your health.

Of the SG authors, the only one I don’t like is professor Timur Agliev. I can’t digest it because there is no analysis in it, no analytics or conclusions, it’s just content that should amuse the viewer only with the effect of “Gee, yes, my game is better than others 9, great”. Even if my guesses are discarded, this is a banal enumeration. I really don’t understand the point of this content. About his video essay, based on nothing, because no one even saw the gameplay, I actually screamed from the bottom of my heart.

And you, Dmitry, little croissant, after all, experiments are a sign of development, and this is good. The main thing is to constantly develop, so as not to stand still. However, I think you understand this yourself. Just do what you did – it turns out well, you’re just not a charismatic person, it happens, that’s why you have such bad feedback on streams, just like during the Debriefing. Many people value not for deeds, but for the cover – this is exactly the situation here. Don’t beat yourself up, just do it!

I already wrote on YouTube under “analysis”, but I’ll write here too: I did everything right. The analysis needs a reboot, conservatives need to show that content can be made of better quality than analyzes of little-needed and mostly crap games with the goal of finding one tiny diamond in a pile of crap.
The most fatal thing in the case of analyzing Zelda is replacing Max with you: somehow it turned out that the majority of the audience turns their nose up at you, they are accustomed to the authorial duet of Max and Vasya and generally squeal at every change, so one change would be enough. It’s clear why this was the case in the analysis: purely technical/financial reasons. You played, Max – no.
If it were possible to rewind time and present it a little differently, I would suggest spending a little more time, recording the entire analysis, and then re-voicing all your lines in Malt’s voice. Perhaps there would be fewer whiners in the comments, and more people who watched to the end and listened.

About your reputation in general: to be an “aesthetic fagot” who highly values ​​“art is not for everyone” and at the same time trying to gain people’s love is clearly something from the category of crazy. You are either “not for everyone”, or you are like everyone’s brother. Why are Malt, Vasya, Kostya and Max loved by people?? Because they never tried to build a wall of “I’m not like you, I’m smarter” (replies to stupid comments don’t count). For this reason, among the new characters on SG, they love Naritsa: their favorite guy. You, in the early stages, created for yourself the image of an “aesthete” and a “hipster”, which you still support with many of your decisions to this day. But in general society, surprise, they don’t like hipsters.

And, since I still burst out with a long comment: I have always liked in your projects and creativity the desire to show people something that they have not seen yet. Turn the game around. Stream absolutely nerdy DnD? Yes please! Postmodern reviews? I have them! An introductory course to the equally nerdy MTG? As I understand it, the budget of the promotional campaign and the sudden change of your position greatly influenced the project.

Dwarf Fortress streams. Perhaps someone mis-sold it to you as a full-fledged DnD substitute. Perhaps the original idea was to turn it on and scream. Yes, Zhenya knows the game and does it better than you. But! I was waiting for someone to take the game and show how he studies it in detail, in an embrace with the wiki, destroys a ton of fortresses on the way to the ideal and, along the way, teaches others and reduces the barrier to entry for them.
And in the end, we have Zhenya, who explains at most a third of the mechanics and does not make life any easier for those who dare to try Dwarf Fortress for the first time.
Could this be a great guide for a beginner?.

No need D:
Moreover, you can post the same thing (at a similar level) in positives? Otherwise, there is a collection, but it doesn’t find any use ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

what is the content of a good stream (outside of stories about the game)? What should a good streamer do to be interesting to listen to??

Difficult question. Here it is more likely to be equal to the majority. Most laughs go very well, regardless of their level (and level of play, let’s say). Some people (me and some others, I asked, found) really don’t like forced laughers, those who try to literally give birth in any situation. In general, any forcedness and unrealism or something (no offense – your laughter in the GTA fashion stream, and Vasya’s laughter are two of the most false and unnatural things in the world) is annoying. I also want calm streams. I want to look at the game itself and the variety of mechanics, with a maximum of useful information about it and a minimum of extraneous conversations. Plus, the stream goes well, where a person stupidly goes through a very difficult game, is tense and sweating, and jokes rather nervously. This is generally an ideal – the streamer suffers, but you are happy. As examples: Akuma, and the passage of Isaac by GleboFen.

Let’s do this: which of the StopGame authors do you enjoy watching and what qualities/behavioral characteristics in them appeal to you?? And vice versa, what irritates you in whom?? Let’s do this: which of the StopGame authors do you enjoy watching and what qualities/behavioral characteristics in them appeal to you?? And vice versa, what irritates you in whom??

The annoying answer is given above: unnatural laughter and an attempt to make a joke in any situation. When you are ready to swear that the person on the other side of the monitor is not funny at all, but for some reason he puffs up and pushes. You can watch anyone with pleasure if the stars align. If the mood is calm, then some GleboFensky indie duet will drop by, if more playful – Vasya or the cancerous Maxim. And personal preferences are decided. Well, the personal charisma of the streamer. Again, mixed with preferences. Example – I don’t feel any positivity towards Oksimiron. Example two: the most charismatic stopgame streamer for me is Bykov, the rest don’t measure up.

Intuition. Just a feeling, they say, there are too many of me, and I’m bothering everyone, and even got into the debriefing with, albeit temporary, but reformatting. We should settle down a little. But in general, any movement is a purely positive phenomenon. Without these experiments, we wouldn’t have half the stopgame. And there wouldn’t have been a debriefing either, I remember how it originated in the form of FrenkoFenoSrach.

Because there are many of you. And there is a lot of audience. And you are not shy to express your private opinion. And many people hear it. And the more they hear, the more feedback. And, as you know, people, based on their cockroaches, the intonations of the author and the phase of Mercury in Sagittarius, perceive any private opinion as an attempt by someone to explain the foundations of the universe. That’s why the conflict. When you were a blogger, you were considered one and a half disabled people at most. Now their number has increased proportionally.

Don’t listen to him, you have charisma, it can be seen in many ways, it’s just that some people consider charisma to be the ability to joke >_>.

When I first heard the news that you were the editor-in-chief, I gave you at most a year in this position. Precisely because you are a hysterical person and it can be seen with the naked eye. Precisely because the recognition and approval of your loved one is more important to you than the success of YOUR team as a whole. And let you present it beautifully, smoothing out the rough edges – I want to develop and that’s all (no, I’m not saying that you’re lying. In part, all this is also true), but first of all you want all this for yourself.

The leader from God is an eminence grise. This is father and mother. Teacher and Judge. I once had a manager who believed that the ideal manager is the one who can get sick for a month and everything will be fine. Because he managed to organize a team that, by and large, does not need him. You’re trying to become indispensable. Again, please understand correctly, I’m not saying that the editor-in-chief should NOT have his own columns, participate in streams, etc.n. No, why?. Must. But that was the main thing when I was a simple author. The editor-in-chief has a different focus. The editor-in-chief needs to develop and inspire others.
I am a journalist by training. And we were taught that the editor-in-chief is a kind of spiritual leader. Give an idea, support inspiration or put down when the journalist crawled into the wrong jungle. Be the heart of a newspaper/magazine. Honestly, I hardly worked in my profession, so I can’t say how it works there in practice. I’m pouring out the theory.

Well, on specific questions:

I’ll note right away that my opinion here is not worth a damn, because I never watch streams, I despise this genre and in general. But t.To. “BABA YAGA CANNOT BE SILENT” I’ll speak out.
And I will warmly support the opinion already expressed – the chemistry between the presenters is extremely important. No forced jokes, friendly atmosphere. Some authors, on the contrary, are better off alone. According to my impressions (extremely meager, I repeat), for example, Fen has almost no chemistry with anyone.

I hate stopgame video reviews. I hate it. Throw stones.
What is the purpose of the review? Give a comprehensive idea of ​​the game, point out the disadvantages, outline the pros. In general, make a verdict: take it or not take it.
In modern gaming journalism, an option is still popular when the author pours out his own emotions. Like, the subjective opinion of my beloved. If you trust my taste, trust the review. Logvinov has been working in this spirit for the last 3 years. No, he doesn’t present this as a subjectivist (on the contrary, everyone who disagrees with him is stupid sheep, what. ), but in fact his reviews are the quintessence of an emotional eruption.
Here SG is trying to do something in between. It seems like we’ll try to be objective and outline the pros and cons, but we’ll also pepper it with emotions, and in general we have the author’s personal opinion.
And the output is neither fish nor meat.
IMHO, of course.

And also, I understand that this is the cry of a dying man in the desert and there will be fewer and fewer people like me from year to year, but… There’s such a lack of text materials. good ones. Not a selection of facts from Wikipedia, but good analytical/entertaining articles. The videos hesitated.

It’s a pity Lex doesn’t write anymore. His articles about graphonium in The Witcher are bomb. WHERE IS THE ANATOMY OF GAMES.

This is a misconception. There are streams that you watch purely for the sake of trash, jokes, frenzy, I don’t know, some of these popular ones are Max and Kostya’s drunken RE4, games in the Grid, Chivalry, etc. And you watch other streams to get some information about the game, or just listen to the dialogue of the presenters (for example, the stream of Fen and Denchik on W40K Sanctus Reach, or Fen and Kostya on Technomancer – and they talked about the game, and then they began to talk about all sorts of different topics, like movies, books, games, life, etc. Soulful, lamp-like, calm)

Question 2: Favorite author and why? Yes, in principle, I watch everyone, except maybe Evgeniy Baranov (no offense), but somehow he hasn’t made an impression on me yet, and his stream with Misha is simply boring for me to watch (Although when Misha streams with another author, it’s interesting and pleasant). All the authors can tell themselves about the game, joke, talk, and maintain the atmosphere. And I also watch you, Dimon, normally on streams, because you have quite interesting views and knowledge that can tell you more about some aspects.

Question 3: How long can you pry?? It’s hard to say, the leading columns have their own vision and plans, so it’s difficult to say in this regard without poking your nose in. But, in terms of the same Analysis – now I personally am not interested in looking at obviously crooked, dumb, old games, through which guys suffer from bugs, crookedness and crookedness of the developers. But the release on Zelda, Alpha Protocol were interesting because: a) Not ancient, crooked, cheap mammoth shit b) The games are popular, well-known, but controversial, and caused quite different opinions about themselves – either due to a lack of understanding of the game itself (like Zelda), or because of disappointment in it while playing it a long time ago (Protocol). To analyze old, average games, IMHO, you can introduce a new section, where exactly the entire “regular” list of games will be given for Analysis

Question 4: I don’t know what is the factor for “branding” with the ChSV sign, so it’s hard to say, but sometimes, this or that opinion (as a joke, for hyperbolization, or etc.).) somehow crosses the border. A recent example: on the Persona 5 stream, you, Dima, said that you turned on the game and vomited from the external style, they say, it’s shit. I won’t give the exact quote, but the point is that you crap, you didn’t give a reason why, and you’re like, explain why I’m wrong. I, as a viewer, did not expect this and even wheezed a little. This is from the very last one. I mean, this is what I mean: if you want to swear or crap on a stream, then sometimes you’d like to hear an argument. And then, simple: “I didn’t like it because it’s shit and crap” – without further argumentation, it’s like that -_-

Something like this. Well, yes, Dimon, you’re really trying to jump over your head, you’re taking everything too close to your heart.
Relax, man.
Keep it simple. You’re too serious.
After Gathering 2k17, you made an incredible impression, how energetic and interesting toastmaster with cool competitions a person, presenter and editor-in-chief with interesting ideas. And so far, in my personal opinion, you keep your brand at a fairly high level, and did not give me personally any doubt that you are boring and lazy, etc.

Everything is fine, just breathe out ╰(◕ᗜ◕)╯

Here everyone writes what they would like to see at stopgame, and all this is good, and this is clear to everyone. But there is one point..
-Grandfather Frost, make more advertising on Stopgame, I ask you, and also add audience loyalty to it, so that without any “fu-u sold out”, “Affiliate content, what is a good phrase for prostitution!».
-Petya, what are you saying?? Aren’t you annoyed by the "Our Races" advertisements??
-No, grandpa. Doesn’t infuriate. I’m even happy with the fact that people who do something worthwhile can get paid enough. I’m not the least bit infuriated by the advertising of Warface and games from Mail, yes they are crap, and yes I know about it, everyone, grandpa, knows about it, but if there is such an evil company as Mail, paying for us to look at Warface for 10 minutes, and then fill the “wound” with good content for a month, then why not?
— What if their editor-in-chief and Rinat cut down the budget, and not a penny goes to the creators??
– Grandpa, you are a fool? No, tell me, are you a fool?? Results of the year on January 3, and not in March, and only because Adobe (the creators of the best software) got a little handsy. Oh yes, and also about the Results of the Year, grandfather, give Pasha a mower so that the topic doesn’t come up again.
-You’re strange, Petya. Okay, a desire is a desire. *grandfather went out onto the balcony, jumped over the fence and flew down*
-I am Nikita, grandfather… Nikita.

1. Regarding SG streams, I don’t really like it when there are more than two people on the stream and one or more are silent for most of the broadcast.

2. HZ. Re-watch Sims streams (or express), in particular Sausage Party

As someone already commented under that issue: “Analysis” is about underrated or mediocre games of the 2000s, Retrozor is about games from the 90s, and then again Zelda.

At least make a video review or continue the Common Sense section.
P.S. I would like more unusual duets. Kostya + Max, Vasya + Malt + Dima (optional), Misha + Daur – this is of course a classic, but there was a cool stream on Divinity: Original Sin with Kost and Galperov.

Idk, there will always be haters everywhere. I like most of the content (except for mmodern and the indicator, as the formats are not for me, but I give them likes, since the product is niche and needs to be supported). It’s a pity that the MTG project died, thanks to the video, I got pretty hooked on this casino, but I can’t help it. I especially want to highlight the work with Twitch. The fact that Naritsa almost marathons alternately with different co-hosts ideally fills the gaps between author’s programs (such as chgk or degradotrdda, etc.). The stories of the series come out and delight, TPshki too, dog handlers hardly linger. as a result – a normal editor-in-chief, even a good one)

“Like, “I love watching Galperov because he is polite, calm and tactful.”. And vice versa, what irritates you in whom?? Like, “I can’t stand Fen, with his extreme arrogance and aggressive behavior towards everyone around him.”
Oh, Dima! And he also complains that he can’t joke! 🙂

I can see how he comes to a rally of whatever Navalny says and immediately “Well, damn it, you’re here too or something.”? Why are you showing up everywhere??».

There is a grain of truth in the words; appearing too often is a bad idea, especially in programs with established presenters. Let him work as a creator because the site needs content, but diluting someone else’s content is a bad idea, unless it implies something like that. That’s why I don’t understand the claim to mass streams. If there are people there, then why shouldn’t they? Or if the stream itself is his initiative.